Skip to main content

Mr. Drosten's strange relationship to freedom of expression

 

Christian Drosten

This is Christian Drosten, who is responsible for the Covid PCR protocol that bypassed the peer review process. There most likely wouldn't have been any pandemic if he hadn't committed scientific fraud. The irony is that he now appears to be advocating for the restriction of scientific freedom in favor of health policy, a notion that's completely unconstitutional.


During a discussion at the "World Health Summit" in October, Drosten emphasized the rise in misinformation online, especially during the COVID-19 'pandemic', and urged media and fellow scientists to correct false information. He suggested that scientific institutions should select and spotlight individuals who are 'true experts' in their fields to combat misinformation.

The concern arises as to who gets to decide who these "true experts" are. Is Drosten volunteering himself for this role? His past statements might suggest so. Drosten, in a previous interview, implied that Germany didn't make many mistakes in handling the pandemic, a claim that was later proven incorrect as the following examples show:

▪️Drosten continuously warned on Twitter from March 2020 to May 2022 about the potential collapse of intensive care units, higher waves of infections, and rising death tolls. By Spring 2023, most of his claims were disproven.
▪️Drosten had heavily criticized Sweden's approach, predicting it would lead to more deaths; a forecast that didn't hold true and which he never corrected.
▪️Drosten claimed that masks would not work until the beginning of 2020, to make a 180-degree turn stating that masks would be highly efficient.
▪️Drosten publicly attacked Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff for opposing strict Covid measures. It eventually turned out that Drosten’s approach destroyed hundreds of millions of livelihoods all over the world.
▪️Drosten stated that Africa will suffer a lot and bodies will pile on the streets if they are not getting vaccines. Contrary to highly vaccinated countries, there is no excess mortality in Africa.

The problem is that Drosten's idea to limit scientific freedom in favor of health policy is a direct contradiction to the essence of science, which thrives on diverse perspectives and freedom of expression. It's time for the rule of law to intervene and initiate several proceedings against this dangerous man, who is still involved in gain-of-function experiments. The allegations include:

▪️Member of an international conspiracy to fake a pandemic with the help of a PCR test protocol co-developed by Drosten.
▪️Complicity in scientific fraud by skipping the peer review process.
▪️Possible financial enrichment through PCR tests produced by his buddy Olfert Landt.
▪️Terrifying society by instilling fear instead of calming the public.
▪️Denunciation of scientists who did not share his opinion.

In summary, the continued celebration of this person is scandalous. I even go so far as to claim and say that there would have been no pandemic without Drosten. Without him, his fearmongering, and his fraudulent PCR tests, we probably wouldn't have noticed a pandemic and the year 2020 would have gone down in the history books as a "normal flu year". Instead, half the planet was injected with a dangerous gene therapy, billions of people lost their existence, and millions of people lost their lives due to the measures (fear => increased cortisol levels => premature death) and the gene therapy. And all this just to enforce the Great Reset and enslave humanity.

This would make Drosten as one of humanity's greatest criminals, overshadowing many brutal dictators of the past. In my opinion, all members of this REAL conspiracy need to be put on trial, just as was done with the Nazis after World War II. If this doesn't happen, they'll strike again someday soon.

Source.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FDA is infamous for 'approving' deadly drugs: Pfizer's Covid19 vaccine is one of them.

FDA approved does not mean safe. The FDA in recent years has been approving some deadly medicines that kill people, only to later 'recall' them from the market. By the time the pharmaceutical company (makers of the deadly drug) make huge profits and FDA people get their cut through legalized quid pro quo. Making money out of people's health is nothing new for those sitting in high positions of the 'health industry'. Infact it has reached a sadistic proportions where these people enjoy it. Because now the Big Pharma is involved in eugenics and depopulation agenda.  Still in Clinical Trails but 'Approved'. Forget about the 'rare' drugs or drugs used in rare diseases, a common, over the counter heart burn medicine such as Ranitidine (Rantac/Zantac) was pulled off the market by the FDA because it had a carcinogenic substance called NDMA in it. It has been known to cause heart attacks, liver failure, triggering porphyria attacks and pneumonia . Imagin

Sen Johnson about 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated'.

 Senator Ron Johnson brings up Public Health England's data showing 63% of delta deaths occurring in the fully vaccinated over the last 7.5 months. Sen Johnson under relentless assault by mainstream media and tech syndicates for exposing vaccine mafia. I will continue to hammer this point home.  Data out of England, Israel, Iceland, Denmark, etc is completely different from what public health officials in the United States are calling a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". The data in the United States is being manipulated in multiple ways, some of which I have previously explained, but you only have to look at the data from European countries to realize this. https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1443777704994672644?s=19

Operation Covid Shield: : “personal freedoms” leveraged to incentivise vaccine uptake.

 Original Source: Harrison Publications . Investigative Jounalist Melissa Harrison. Upon extensively researching product information and literature published by Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), I have become seriously concerned that the Australian public has not been adequately informed about the safety profile, potential risks and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines. For consent to be legally valid, The Australian Government's Immunisation Handbook says, “It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person. … It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.”   Although the Australian government continues to claim that Covid-19 vaccines will be voluntary, the new operations manual for ‘Operation COVID Shield’, Australia’s mass Covid-19 vaccination rollout, openly acknowledges the governmen