Skip to main content

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi: Our Immune System Recognizes SARS Covid 2 Virus.

 
The big pharma funded corporate scientists and media have been telling us that you need to take the vaccines because our Immune systems do not recognize the Covid-19 virus as it is 'novel'. But in fact the SARS Cov 2 virus (covid19 virus) resembles SARS Cov 1 virus (that causes SARS) by 80% to 90%. Now, recent studies have shown that our immune systems recognize Covid-19 virus remarkably well and mount a strong, quick and effective response to the invader.


Basics of immune response:
  • Based on immune cells, the immune response can be lymphocyte mediated (for viruses) or neutrophil mediated (for bacteria).
  • Based on the antibodies developed against a pathogen, the immune response could be IgM mediated (for new pathogens) or IgG/IgA mediated (for old pathogens which had already infected us).
IgM (immunoglobulin M) mediated response takes weeks (around 4 weeks) to develop while IgG/IgA (recall response Igs) mediated response takes just 3 to 5 days. This is because our immune system has memory and it remembers the old pathogens. When the same pathogens infect again, IgG and IgA mediated respose is elicited. These are also called recall immunoglobulins.

Recent studies (3 independent studies from the US) have shown that when Covid-19 virus or viral gene is injected into a person's body (like a vaccine shot), the immune system acts through IgG/IgA immunoglobulins, mounting a quick strong response to the virus within 3 to 5 days. This is because, even though covid19 virus is new and different from SARS Cov 1, it can not change its antigenic structure much, so our immune systems can still recognize and attack it. Unlike the influenza virus which totally changes itself and evades our immune system, forcing it to mount a slow response (IgM mediated) - which coronavirus is not capable of doing.

Another study done from Denmark shows that even real life infections by Covid-19 virus (like throat infection or flu like infection - not injected one) ALSO elicited an IgG/IgA mediated quick response. Indicating that our immune systems recognize the Covid-19 virus quite well.

These studies once again indicate that the experimental vaccines are unnecessary and the program should be stopped immediately, given their harmful adverse reactions. 

Spike proteins produced by endothelial cells (when you vaccinate a person), force our lymphocytes to attack the endothelial cells (cells lining the blood vessels)- this causes blood clots and blocks in the vessels. Read our post 'Covid19 Spike Proteins and Coagulation Abnormalities' for details on blood clots, bleeding and blocks due to the experimental vaccines. Listen to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi explain this beautifully at 11:40. His every word is gold. Don't miss this video. 

This is a remarkable piece of information. We can cast away the fears of the pandemic and get back to our normal lives like before, return to our friends and families and return to the wonderful world we had before Covid-19. Share it as much as you can.

References and Studies:
  • SARS CoV2 Elicits Robust Adaptive Immune Responses Regardless of Disease Severity. Click Here.
  • Human IgG and IgA Responses to Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines. Click Here.
  • SARS CoV2 mRNA Vaccination Induces Functionally Diverse Antibodies to NTD, RBD and S2. Click Here

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Story of Vitamin B17/Amygdalin/Laetrile/ and Cancer

Amygdalin is a compound found in seeds of all fruits except those of citrus fruits. It is found in high amounts in Apricot kernels and Almonds.  Anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin have been discussed and argued over and over through out the cancer research circles. A quick google search of 'Amygdalin' will tell you that it is a 'quack medicine', that it has no action on cancer cells and that it is dangerously poisonous substance. Laetrile is the name of semi-synthetic (drug- tablet and injection) form of amygdalin available in the market.  Let me present the readers with PubMed articles - published data in prestigious peer reviewed journals, regarding the anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin. Links will be provided with each statement. Amygdalin has anti-tumor tumor properties. It has antitussive and antiasthamatic effects. It has apoptotic effect on Renal Fibroblasts- helpful in chronic kidney disease. It stimulates the immune system and acts as an analg...

FDA approves experimental Genetically Modified Salmon for human consumption without Safety Trials/Studies

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has brazenly betrayed the public's trust by approving the world's first genetically modified (GM) animal in direct defiance of science – a transgenic salmon branded "AquAdvantage" that has never been proven safe for human consumption or the natural environment. The New York Times (NYT) reports that AquAdvantage, a product of AquaBounty Technologies, has received official FDA approval after years of fierce lobbying by its manufacturer in favor of open approval. Despite repeated warnings from detractors that AquAdvantage poses serious threats to aquatic ecosystems and humans, the FDA has determined that this GM fish is completely safe for everything and everyone on the planet.  Many of the claims made about AquAdvantage by its manufacturer have been debunked, including the lie that this "Frankenfish" grows more quickly than natural salmon and is less prone to disease – both of which claims are patently false. ...

Mr. Drosten's strange relationship to freedom of expression

  Christian Drosten This is Christian Drosten , who is responsible for the Covid PCR protocol that bypassed the peer review process. There most likely wouldn't have been any pandemic if he hadn't committed scientific fraud. The irony is that he now appears to be advocating for the restriction of scientific freedom in favor of health policy, a notion that's completely unconstitutional. During a discussion at the "World Health Summit" in October, Drosten emphasized the rise in misinformation online, especially during the COVID-19 'pandemic', and urged media and fellow scientists to correct false information. He suggested that scientific institutions should select and spotlight individuals who are 'true experts' in their fields to combat misinformation. The concern arises as to who gets to decide who these "true experts" are. Is Drosten volunteering himself for this role? His past statements might suggest so. Drosten, in a previous interview...