Skip to main content

India's Legal Fraternity Hits Back At Covid Plandemic.

Image
By Dr. Ahmed

Are you being coerced to take a vaccine at your workplace or university? Are you being deprived of earning livelihood for your family? Are you experiencing restrictions against your movements because you are not vaccinated? You will be delighted to know the recent Gauhati High Court Judgement regarding restrictions on Unvaccinated people. Click Here and Here for details on the Judgement.

Restriction On Unvaccinated Persons For Leaving From Their Houses, Debarring Them From Earning Livelihood, Violative Of Art 14,19 and 21: The Judgement said.
It further went on and said

There is nothing to show that vaccinated persons (first dose) cannot be infected with coronavirus, or they cannot be spreaders. As the vaccinated and unvaccinated persons would have to follow the Covid proper behaviour protocols as per the SOP, there is no justification for discrimination.

Previously Meghalaya High Court had given a similar judgement saying, "Vaccination by coercive methods is violative of fundamental rights." Click Here. The Gauhati High Court Judgement was a direct, hard hitting and no nonsense judgement protecting the rights of unvaccinated citizens though.


While every other system has collapsed on the common man, the legal system of India seems to be the only one standing up for him. In May 2021, The Indian Bar Association (IBA) had served a legal notice to WHO's chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan for 'disinformation and misguiding the people of India in order to fulfill her agenda.' It especially mentioned Ivermectin in its notice. This legal notice became sensational and went viral all over the world. Click Here for IBA's Press Release on this topic.

Two studies on Ivermectin which the IBA mentioned in its notice:

More recently the Indian Bar Association has drafted a letter to the President, Prime Minister and Home Ministers of India calling for action against 'Toxic Philanthropist Bill Gates', 'Vaccine Syndicates', 'Tech Syndicates' and 'Tech Bullies' for genocide through their acts of commission and omission related to the Covid-19 pandemic. IBA drafted this letter through an NGO called Human Rights Security Council. Its a 32 page letter detailing the criminal activities of Bill Gates foundation, pharma industry and big tech industry. Click Here for the full letter. 

What can you do practically:

If you are being discriminated for not taking the vaccine, at your workplace or university or elsewhere, you can write a letter to the head of your institution first, explaining them that you are not legally obliged to take a vaccine or medical treatment against you will. And that its illegal to coerce your into taking the experimental vaccine. 

The Awaken India Movement has drafted a well informed, well written document which you can use as your letter for the head of your institution. Click Here For The Letter. You can attach the Judgements of Meghalaya and Guwahati High Courts in this respect, along with your letter. 

If the letter doesn't work and you are still being forced to take the vaccine, send a mail to Awaken India Movement and your case will be taken up by Indian Bar Association. Email at: mail2aim@protonmail.ch

If you want to keep your identity hidden, IBA can take up your case and fight it on its own. Your name will not be revealed. But the main question to ask is, are you really willing to fight for your rights? 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Story of Vitamin B17/Amygdalin/Laetrile/ and Cancer

By Dr. Ahmed
Amygdalin is a compound found in seeds of all fruits except those of citrus fruits. It is found in high amounts in Apricot kernels and Almonds.  Anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin have been discussed and argued over and over through out the cancer research circles. A quick google search of 'Amygdalin' will tell you that it is a 'quack medicine', that it has no action on cancer cells and that it is dangerously poisonous substance. Laetrile is the name of semi-synthetic (drug- tablet and injection) form of amygdalin available in the market.  Let me present the readers with PubMed articles - published data in prestigious peer reviewed journals, regarding the anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin. Links will be provided with each statement. Amygdalin has anti-tumor tumor properties. It has antitussive and antiasthamatic effects. It has apoptotic effect on Renal Fibroblasts- helpful in chronic kidney disease. It stimulates the immune system and acts as an analg...
Post a Comment
Read more

FDA approves experimental Genetically Modified Salmon for human consumption without Safety Trials/Studies

By Dr. Ahmed
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has brazenly betrayed the public's trust by approving the world's first genetically modified (GM) animal in direct defiance of science – a transgenic salmon branded "AquAdvantage" that has never been proven safe for human consumption or the natural environment. The New York Times (NYT) reports that AquAdvantage, a product of AquaBounty Technologies, has received official FDA approval after years of fierce lobbying by its manufacturer in favor of open approval. Despite repeated warnings from detractors that AquAdvantage poses serious threats to aquatic ecosystems and humans, the FDA has determined that this GM fish is completely safe for everything and everyone on the planet.  Many of the claims made about AquAdvantage by its manufacturer have been debunked, including the lie that this "Frankenfish" grows more quickly than natural salmon and is less prone to disease – both of which claims are patently false. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mr. Drosten's strange relationship to freedom of expression

By Dr. Ahmed
  Christian Drosten This is Christian Drosten , who is responsible for the Covid PCR protocol that bypassed the peer review process. There most likely wouldn't have been any pandemic if he hadn't committed scientific fraud. The irony is that he now appears to be advocating for the restriction of scientific freedom in favor of health policy, a notion that's completely unconstitutional. During a discussion at the "World Health Summit" in October, Drosten emphasized the rise in misinformation online, especially during the COVID-19 'pandemic', and urged media and fellow scientists to correct false information. He suggested that scientific institutions should select and spotlight individuals who are 'true experts' in their fields to combat misinformation. The concern arises as to who gets to decide who these "true experts" are. Is Drosten volunteering himself for this role? His past statements might suggest so. Drosten, in a previous interview...
Post a Comment
Read more