Skip to main content

Rothschild Applied Patent For Covid-19 Testing and Tracking System in 2015?

Image
By Dr. Ahmed

 

Mr. Richard Rothschild had applied for Patenting of Covid-19 Testing Method in 2015. You can find the above article at National Library Of Medicine- Click Here. 

It might disappear from the net in future so I have made a pdf page of the article- Click Here. 

'Fact Checkers' tell people not to believe in this misinformation, referring to 2015/10/13 being a 'priority date' and not 'application date'. Reuters Fact Checker says, " The priority date can refer to the earliest filing date in a family of related patent applications, or to the earliest filing date of a particular feature of an invention." Does this in any way mean that Mr. Rothschild did not have prior knowledge of Covid-19 type of pandemic that would arise in future? I mean his buddies Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci knew it all along. Both had publicly boasted that such a Global Pandemic would hit in future, with Bill Gates actually showing the picture of Coronavirus with its spikes in his TedX talk. 

Now if we look at the patent itself, its more of a draconian scheme to collect and monitor biometrics and health/physical data of people and less of an invention. 


Click Here to view the patent. 

Click Here to view the pdf version (just in case if the web link suddenly goes 404). 

A look at the Abstract of the patent gives us an idea about what the 'invention' of Mr. Rothschild is all about, " A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions."

A picture from the patent. 

If you scroll down to "Background of the Invention" section, the very first point says, " The present invention relates to diagnosing an individual's health/wellness, and more particularly, to a system and method for using a mobile computing device (e.g., a smartphone) to acquire and provide vital signs, which can then be used to determine (or aid in the determination of) an individual's health/wellness, including whether an individual is suffering from a bacterial and/or viral infection (e.g., COVID-19, etc.) or other respiratory conditions or symptoms. The present invention could be used in conjunction with a telemedicine or “digital health” system to provide a reliable and convenient method for remote collection and observation of a patient's vital signs."    

It talks about the possibility of connecting every electronic device around you to a central 'host' which will collect and observe your data. Since when has dystopian, draconian 24/7 surveillance and storage of people's biometrics and health information, become an 'invention?'

👉Share it. Help us bypass the suppressive algorithms. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Story of Vitamin B17/Amygdalin/Laetrile/ and Cancer

By Dr. Ahmed
Amygdalin is a compound found in seeds of all fruits except those of citrus fruits. It is found in high amounts in Apricot kernels and Almonds.  Anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin have been discussed and argued over and over through out the cancer research circles. A quick google search of 'Amygdalin' will tell you that it is a 'quack medicine', that it has no action on cancer cells and that it is dangerously poisonous substance. Laetrile is the name of semi-synthetic (drug- tablet and injection) form of amygdalin available in the market.  Let me present the readers with PubMed articles - published data in prestigious peer reviewed journals, regarding the anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin. Links will be provided with each statement. Amygdalin has anti-tumor tumor properties. It has antitussive and antiasthamatic effects. It has apoptotic effect on Renal Fibroblasts- helpful in chronic kidney disease. It stimulates the immune system and acts as an analg...
Post a Comment
Read more

FDA approves experimental Genetically Modified Salmon for human consumption without Safety Trials/Studies

By Dr. Ahmed
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has brazenly betrayed the public's trust by approving the world's first genetically modified (GM) animal in direct defiance of science – a transgenic salmon branded "AquAdvantage" that has never been proven safe for human consumption or the natural environment. The New York Times (NYT) reports that AquAdvantage, a product of AquaBounty Technologies, has received official FDA approval after years of fierce lobbying by its manufacturer in favor of open approval. Despite repeated warnings from detractors that AquAdvantage poses serious threats to aquatic ecosystems and humans, the FDA has determined that this GM fish is completely safe for everything and everyone on the planet.  Many of the claims made about AquAdvantage by its manufacturer have been debunked, including the lie that this "Frankenfish" grows more quickly than natural salmon and is less prone to disease – both of which claims are patently false. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mr. Drosten's strange relationship to freedom of expression

By Dr. Ahmed
  Christian Drosten This is Christian Drosten , who is responsible for the Covid PCR protocol that bypassed the peer review process. There most likely wouldn't have been any pandemic if he hadn't committed scientific fraud. The irony is that he now appears to be advocating for the restriction of scientific freedom in favor of health policy, a notion that's completely unconstitutional. During a discussion at the "World Health Summit" in October, Drosten emphasized the rise in misinformation online, especially during the COVID-19 'pandemic', and urged media and fellow scientists to correct false information. He suggested that scientific institutions should select and spotlight individuals who are 'true experts' in their fields to combat misinformation. The concern arises as to who gets to decide who these "true experts" are. Is Drosten volunteering himself for this role? His past statements might suggest so. Drosten, in a previous interview...
Post a Comment
Read more