Skip to main content

Medical Industrial Complex Part 1: Public Health In Corporate Hands.

 The WHO constitution came into existence on 7th April 1984, without any genuine elections. Almost 3/4th of the world is influenced by the 'Advice and Recommendations' given by WHO. Billions of patients receive medical treatment partly or dominantly based on recommendations from the WHO. It has more than 194 member states, including all the wealthy states of the world. 

In the beginning WHO was supposed to receive funds from the governments of member states. But few years ago WHO setup 'Private Partnerships' (in accordance with Agenda 21's Public-Private partnerships?) that allows it to receive funds and support from private firms and industries. Since then, its credibility seriously tarnished, its independence seriously questioned and there has been a total lack of transparency with regards to scientific proof that supports its recommendations and its collisions with the MNCs (multinational corporations).


A Clip from Trust Who. WHO chief says WHO has to work on priorities which serve the interests of donors.

In May 2007, Dr. Andrew Oxman and Dr. Atle Freheim from Norwegian Knowledge Center for Health Services and Dr. John Lavis from Mc Master University, Canada, interviewed the management of WHO and analyzed its various recommendations. Both the doctors expressed doubts about the various recommendations given by WHO and whether they have any scientific backing. Dr. Oxman also criticized WHO for recommending-without any scientific proof that they are more effective- costly medications while cheaper generic medications were available.
Read More at: cbc.ca article.
Global(ist) organizations like WHO and UN do not come under jurisdiction of any nation state and they are totally resistant to any democratic investigation or audit. They are harder to decipher, opaque, complicated and all powerful.
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg explains how WHO is above all laws and jurisdictions.

Big Pharma or Ph RMA:

Who are these people who control the WHO and almost every public health authority in entire world? The Big Pharma is a coalition of Pharmaceuticals, Insurance providers and investor owned hospitals in partnership with American Health Care For Future. Its a global lobby for the US pharmaceutical industry. Members of Big pharma keep interchanging their positions from high positions in Big Pharma to influential positions in government, back and forth through successive US administrations. But they do not have any allegiance to any country nor they respect any borders or sovereignty of any nation. Having no allegiance to any country, glutted with wealth, they can shift at will, moving their base from one point of globe to another and thus benefit from low operational costs, bypass regulations and taxes, and are more difficult to regulate and enforce laws upon.

At first the Medical Industrial Complex (another name for Big Pharma) used to fund its own studies and trials. While this practice is still alive, they have now deviced a new strategy to get around any possible public scrutiny- Buying the Academic Institutions or The Research Wings of these institutions and buying their way in the so called 'Peer reviewed Journal Publications' through their 'Funds' (either directly or through a 'third party') 

These institutions get paid by NIH  or CDC (which are usually headed by 'their man' or have their men up in important positions) or some other public health agency for research of a drug (or vaccine). The Big Pharma joins the research. Once the research is completed, Big Pharma gets the patent of the drug and the public health agencies get nothing. Plus, the goodwill of the Public Health Agencies and Research Institutes come tagged with the new drug- an added bonus for the pharma company. Unbelievable right? Watch the Big Pharma representative admit it to a congressional hearing: 

US Congress Rep Alexandia Ocasia-Cortez grills Big Pharma Rep.

Wikileaks documents illustrate that WHO expert group was highly responsive to industry lobbying- In 2009, the 'expert' group met with the Pharma industry but refused to meet public health groups known to be Big Pharma critics. Click Here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FDA is infamous for 'approving' deadly drugs: Pfizer's Covid19 vaccine is one of them.

FDA approved does not mean safe. The FDA in recent years has been approving some deadly medicines that kill people, only to later 'recall' them from the market. By the time the pharmaceutical company (makers of the deadly drug) make huge profits and FDA people get their cut through legalized quid pro quo. Making money out of people's health is nothing new for those sitting in high positions of the 'health industry'. Infact it has reached a sadistic proportions where these people enjoy it. Because now the Big Pharma is involved in eugenics and depopulation agenda.  Still in Clinical Trails but 'Approved'. Forget about the 'rare' drugs or drugs used in rare diseases, a common, over the counter heart burn medicine such as Ranitidine (Rantac/Zantac) was pulled off the market by the FDA because it had a carcinogenic substance called NDMA in it. It has been known to cause heart attacks, liver failure, triggering porphyria attacks and pneumonia . Imagin

Sen Johnson about 'Pandemic of the Unvaccinated'.

 Senator Ron Johnson brings up Public Health England's data showing 63% of delta deaths occurring in the fully vaccinated over the last 7.5 months. Sen Johnson under relentless assault by mainstream media and tech syndicates for exposing vaccine mafia. I will continue to hammer this point home.  Data out of England, Israel, Iceland, Denmark, etc is completely different from what public health officials in the United States are calling a "pandemic of the unvaccinated". The data in the United States is being manipulated in multiple ways, some of which I have previously explained, but you only have to look at the data from European countries to realize this. https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1443777704994672644?s=19

Operation Covid Shield: : “personal freedoms” leveraged to incentivise vaccine uptake.

 Original Source: Harrison Publications . Investigative Jounalist Melissa Harrison. Upon extensively researching product information and literature published by Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), I have become seriously concerned that the Australian public has not been adequately informed about the safety profile, potential risks and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines. For consent to be legally valid, The Australian Government's Immunisation Handbook says, “It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person. … It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.”   Although the Australian government continues to claim that Covid-19 vaccines will be voluntary, the new operations manual for ‘Operation COVID Shield’, Australia’s mass Covid-19 vaccination rollout, openly acknowledges the governmen