Dr. Byram Bridle about Covid-19 Vaccines.

Dr. Byram talks about covid19 vaccines.

Dr. Byram Bridle is viral immunologist and Associate Professor in Dept. of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph. The university had received a grant of $230k from Ontario government for development of Covid-19 vaccine. Dr. Bridle was( able to obtain Pfizer's Biodistribution Study through Japan's regulatory agency on drugs. Biodistribution study looks at how a drug (vaccine) is distributed in the body, how it passes through various organs and where it accumulates. The vaccine doesn't stay at the injection site as claimed but Pfizer's documents show that it travels all over the body within few hours of inoculation.

Dr. Bridle gave an interview in which he shared his observations about the viral Spike protein which our bodies start manufacturing once we take the experimental vaccines. He expressed concern that the spike protein itself is toxic and may cause heart inflammation, blood clots, bleeding. That interview went viral. Since then Dr. Bridle has been subjected to attacks from mainstream media and corporate scientists.

Dr. Byram said that he is particularly concerned about the spike proteins accumulating in ovaries in high amounts. The polyethylene glycol put in these vaccines may cause anaphylactic shock in some people. Its put in the vaccine helps facilitate the spread of the nanoparticles throughout the body (5 fold greater spread when polyethylene glycol is added). Studies have not been done in humans with the actual vaccine formulation. Lipid nanoparticle technology has been evaluated in humans but not the entire vaccine formulation.

"Rodents do not express the same receptors as we do, so they are totally inappropriate to evaluate possible fertility issues in human beings."

Comments

Story of Vitamin B17/Amygdalin/Laetrile/ and Cancer

Amygdalin is a compound found in seeds of all fruits except those of citrus fruits. It is found in high amounts in Apricot kernels and Almonds. Anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin have been discussed and argued over and over through out the cancer research circles. A quick google search of 'Amygdalin' will tell you that it is a 'quack medicine', that it has no action on cancer cells and that it is dangerously poisonous substance. Laetrile is the name of semi-synthetic (drug- tablet and injection) form of amygdalin available in the market. Let me present the readers with PubMed articles - published data in prestigious peer reviewed journals, regarding the anti-tumor properties of Amygdalin. Links will be provided with each statement. Amygdalin has anti-tumor tumor properties. It has antitussive and antiasthamatic effects. It has apoptotic effect on Renal Fibroblasts- helpful in chronic kidney disease. It stimulates the immune system and acts as an analg...

FDA approves experimental Genetically Modified Salmon for human consumption without Safety Trials/Studies

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has brazenly betrayed the public's trust by approving the world's first genetically modified (GM) animal in direct defiance of science – a transgenic salmon branded "AquAdvantage" that has never been proven safe for human consumption or the natural environment. The New York Times (NYT) reports that AquAdvantage, a product of AquaBounty Technologies, has received official FDA approval after years of fierce lobbying by its manufacturer in favor of open approval. Despite repeated warnings from detractors that AquAdvantage poses serious threats to aquatic ecosystems and humans, the FDA has determined that this GM fish is completely safe for everything and everyone on the planet. Many of the claims made about AquAdvantage by its manufacturer have been debunked, including the lie that this "Frankenfish" grows more quickly than natural salmon and is less prone to disease – both of which claims are patently false. ...

Mr. Drosten's strange relationship to freedom of expression

Christian Drosten This is Christian Drosten , who is responsible for the Covid PCR protocol that bypassed the peer review process. There most likely wouldn't have been any pandemic if he hadn't committed scientific fraud. The irony is that he now appears to be advocating for the restriction of scientific freedom in favor of health policy, a notion that's completely unconstitutional. During a discussion at the "World Health Summit" in October, Drosten emphasized the rise in misinformation online, especially during the COVID-19 'pandemic', and urged media and fellow scientists to correct false information. He suggested that scientific institutions should select and spotlight individuals who are 'true experts' in their fields to combat misinformation. The concern arises as to who gets to decide who these "true experts" are. Is Drosten volunteering himself for this role? His past statements might suggest so. Drosten, in a previous interview...

+ Health and Sciences +

Search This Blog